Sure

The software has never fully worked for him and now when he opened the scam report you fix the issue? lol

In my opinion he should receive a full refund since you never really took his issue seriously

No, the software was working fine for the majority of users, he reported the bug I and I told him that I would fix it by tomorrow (which is today) and once I woke up and fixed the issue, I see he opened this scam report.

I don't see how this is a report. The software is working properly yet he refuses to use it.

At this point, I just believe it's his huge ego that's keeping this thread alive, he refuses to discuss with us yet he still doesn't want to consider the facts.

I haven't received the new version, i don't know if its autoupdate or not, but i honestly don't care.

And yes of course its very easy to PM other people with the 'working' version and then tell them to make a video.

I am completely done with these 2 guys, they even called me retarded wich is ridiculous for people that are actually supposed to help in this situation

Yes, you have ivar, it's auto updated. All you have to do is open the software once again and you'll be greeted with the new version.

We PM trusted members of the community to prove that the software functions correctly since you refuse to use the tool yourself and keep lying that it isn't working.

We called you a retard because you start to get bigger then you are by saying my code is 'shit' when you have no idea what you're looking at. You were clueless to what you were doing whilst being rude about it, hence us being rude too.

It's time for you to put your ego aside, grow the fuck up and stop acting like a child. Everything is working fine and you're just causing more drama.

ayy lmao devs are arguing with a user that the tool is working, instead of trying to help the user fix the problem xDD

Actually, we did fix the problem. We are just demonstrating that our tool works fine now, yet, he refuses to discuss.

Everything is working fine

So Ivarovich must provide proof he didn't know this would happen, and you must provide proof you told him that it was a beta and he was part of the error checking team. 

 

Normally, when you are uncertain your tool works properly, you let a few beta testers use it while you check for errors, and then release it to public after everything was tested. Why didn't you do that? 

They are currently only 10 customers, all are beta testers and agreed to help us fix bugs.

Are you gonna waste your time arguing now or you are going to start coding instead?

Actually, I've been coding for 4 hours now. Thanks for letting me know

EDIT: To everyone. You can all complain based on what Ivar said but nonetheless, we have the only checker that is proxyless and we didn't pull and iDev and scam everyone once our product got some criticism.

I highly doubt they are judging your code, I think they are judging the fact that as it was released early it's not working as everyone would expect so they want a refund. Even if it's a beta. It's up to you when you stop calling it a beta. You could keep it a beta forever and keep saying errors are normal, forever.

Everyone that bought the product has been thoroughly explained the terms and services, they all confirmed they were okay with helping me fix the bugs and that they did, in fact, know it was a beta and that errors WOULD occur.

So what you are saying is that it is now fixed?

Yes, the checker is fully working since this morning.

He obviously said that as a metaphor. It's obvious you didn't write the code 3 lines at a time. Don't focus on a sentence when there's a whole thread pointing at you and nodecode. :/

I completely understand that it's a metaphor, I just don't enjoy when clueless people think they can judge my code.

metaphor noun [ C or U ] UK ​ /ˈmet.ə.fɔːr/ US ​ /ˈmet̬.ə.fɔːr/ ​ C2 an expression, often found in literature, that describes a person or object by referring to something that is considered to have similar characteristics to that person or object:

 

Basically he compared you to a guy who writes 3 lines of code a hour just to call you a shit coder, but doubt you could understand that if you cant make your own checker work.

Shit coder? I'd like to see you try and code a hello world. My checker is fully working, no need to ignore the facts.

No problem .

Netseal

There's a bounty for any successful cracks, i'll upload the details to my website soon, good luck.

I just want a full refund because this tool is not working out.

 

I dont care if it is updated right now. I just dont want to have a tool with a developer like this.

Too bad you don't like me, I'm a transparent and honest developer and I try my best to stay polite with everyone.

That's the problem, coeff is barely putting effort in it. If you ever watched one of hes stream hes just lurking stackoverflow and copy pasting 3 lines of codes in 1 hour. I do not see any future in this tool so i demand a refund.

If you believe you're experienced enough to judge my code, then you'd realize pretty quickly that that isn't the case.

They are over 4.4k lines of code in only the NodeCode project (this excludes the loader, the obfuscator and etc) 

Proof from the code metrics calculation: https://vgy.me/FoNL0T.png

Now, using your logic, if I write 3 lines of code in an hour, I would have spent 1495 hours coding this project.

That equates to 62 days if I coded 24h/7

Realistically, I code 3 hours on weekdays and 6 on weekends.

Using that, I code 27 hours a week.

So it would take me around 55 weeks (over a year) to write 3 lines of code in an hour.

If you feel like you can judge me code, fine, but make sure your assumption is right at least.

By the way, the bug was fixed right after I woke up. You could have just glanced at the conversation and known that.

Spoiler

The cherry on top; this guy keeps threatening/blackmailing me that he'll release my so called dox. This clearly demonstrates his childish attitude and lack of business acumen.