You the boss
LIT METHOD [Lost in Transit]
#281
Posted 27 February 2023 - 10:02 PM
#287
Posted 04 March 2023 - 10:05 AM
Disappearing ink lmao. It's known that a lot of ink manufacturer had plans to develop "disappearing ink". No. There is invisible ink. There are ways to make ink disappear but there is no such thing as disappearing ink.
Edit: Okay seems I was wrong but I'm still not 100% sold on the website for which the "about us" page looks completely laughable
LIT stands for Lost in Transit meaning you want the package to get stuck with the courier in some way so that it never arrives anywhere receiving a refund.
There are many ways you can do this, the most effective one I’ve heard is creating a label with disappearing ink that will lose its color sometime later.
Leaving a blank label behind, as such, the package will be marked as delivered, but lost in transit.
Happy and safe refunding!
Leechers will be reported!
Edited by m0rggy, 04 March 2023 - 10:12 AM.
#288
Posted 04 March 2023 - 10:13 AM
LIT stands for Lost in Transit meaning you want the package to get stuck with the courier in some way so that it never arrives anywhere receiving a refund.
There are many ways you can do this, the most effective one I’ve heard is creating a label with disappearing ink that will lose its color sometime later.
Leaving a blank label behind, as such, the package will be marked as delivered, but lost in transit.
Happy and safe refunding!
Leechers will be reported!
good shit
#289
Posted 05 March 2023 - 08:29 PM
LIT stands for Lost in Transit meaning you want the package to get stuck with the courier in some way so that it never arrives anywhere receiving a refund.
There are many ways you can do this, the most effective one I’ve heard is creating a label with disappearing ink that will lose its color sometime later.
Leaving a blank label behind, as such, the package will be marked as delivered, but lost in transit.
Happy and safe refunding!
Leechers will be reported!
nice bro
Just a coder trying to afford my caffeine addiction
Users browsing this thread: