[#1] NetScraper 2.0 | Grab 270K+ Proxies in a few Seconds! | Advance Proxy Scraper + Checker | #1 Best For Cracking |
#81
Posted 14 February 2017 - 11:27 PM
#86
Posted 21 February 2017 - 02:18 AM
Very good product, very good return seller always present waiting for the option Socks5 and new source.
This was 100% worth my money. It works absolutely fine
That's a Perfect tool to get alot of Proxies
This program is amazing i give it a major vouch
HUGE VOUCH
Works for League of Legends quite well
Was getting
800-1200 CPMusingGatherProxyProxiesnow using NetScraper gets me 7k too 10k CPM
HQ Tool and a HQ Seller
Don't Hesitate too buy from Tom
Purchased it two days ago and im getting some really good proxys! I tend to run the program to check the proxys at very high thread count and not once has it slowed down or crashed. Defo recommend this program
Leaving this vouch here.
I purchased a few days ago and it gives you proxies fast af, under a second.
I recommend.. for the price why not.
Vouch.
High Quality and Trusted user.
ok so let's start off
I'm really impressed by the tool i got a tons of proxies in a matter of seconds
The OP added diverse proxy Sources .
The proxy checker does the Job and works good
overall i would recommend this for any new cracker
Vouch for this tool
HQ Tool for beginners ! i scraped 2k proxies in 0.001 sec and the checker works also ! Cheap price AF ! Worth buying
Vouch FeedBack
Recived A Vouch of this Great Tool
what i have to say is this tool Is the fastest Proxy scraper/Checker
You can use over 40 Threads And tool will ot crash !
Enough With
Public Proxy Scrapers
Buy Now !!!
Received a vouch.
Testing and posting a review later.
Edit:
My review:
Pros:
The scrapper works really fast. A lot of working proxy sources. You can easily get over 200k proxies.
The design is nice and flat,easy to understand. A few clicks and you get what you want.
Very cheap,but I think the one month license is useless considering lifetime costs 3$ more.
Thanks For all your Reviews and Vouches glad you All are satisfied
Users browsing this thread: